Improvised vehicle armour is vehicle armour added in the field that was not originally part of the design, in any sort of official up-armour kit, nor centrally planned.
Improvised vehicle armour has appeared on the battlefield for as long as there have been armoured vehicles in existence. In World War II, tank crews of many armies attached spare tracks to the hulls and turrets of their tanks. In the Vietnam War, U.S. "gun trucks" were reinforced with sandbags and locally fabricated steel armour plate.
More recently, U.S. troops in Iraq have armoured their Humvees and various military transport vehicles with scrap materials: this came to be known as "hillbilly armour" by the Americans, or sometimes "hajji armour" when installed by Iraqi contractors.
Video Improvised vehicle armour
World War I
The first armoured cars to see combat were entirely improvised, although this soon changed as the war continued. A few were used by the Belgian army during the German invasion. The British Royal Naval Air Service received reports of this and converted some of their own cars. Improvised conversion continued until December 1914 when the first standardized design entered service.
Maps Improvised vehicle armour
World War II
Most armies involved in the conflict adopted some form of improvised armour at some point. The Home Guard in the United Kingdom equipped itself with a number of vehicles with improvised armour. Later in 1944 some Churchill tanks had sections of track attached to their existing armour to provide extra protection. M8 Greyhound armoured car crews would sometimes line the floors of their vehicles with sandbags to provide extra protection against landmines. US tanks sometimes had spare track attached to them. This was done with the M4 Sherman and Stuart tanks.
During the North African Campaign the German Afrika Korps attached strips of spare track to the front of their Panzer IIIs
Vietnam War
In the Vietnam War, U.S. gun trucks were armoured with sandbags and locally fabricated steel armour plate.
The Troubles in Northern Ireland
In the early 1990s, the Provisional IRA's South Armagh Brigade came up with a new strategy to restrict British Army foot patrols near Crossmaglen. They developed two sniper teams to attack British Army and RUC patrols. They fired from an improvised armoured car using a .50 BMG calibre M82 sniper rifle were they fired out of the back of Mazda fitted with a metal plate. Signs were put up around South Armagh reading "Sniper at Work". The snipers murdered a total of nine members of the security forces: seven soldiers and two police constables. Between 1992 - 1994 they killed eight security forces. The last and ninth member to be killed was British soldier, bombardier Steven Restorick.
Iraq War
In post-invasion Iraq, improvised vehicle armour is colloquially referred to as Hillbilly armor, farmer armor or hajji armor by American troops.
During the occupation that followed the 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein's regime, insurgent forces deployed roadside bombs, RPG teams, and snipers with small arms to attack military vehicles on supply convoys and other known routes.
To protect themselves from these threats, American troops began reinforcing their Humvees, LMTVs and other vehicles with whatever was available, including scrap metal, kevlar blankets and vests, compromised ballistic glass and plywood. In some cases they relied on Iraqis to assist them in these efforts, and referred to the result as "Hajji" armour. They were also officially advised to line the floors of their Humvees with sandbags to deaden the impact of land mine explosions.
Some officers in Iraq were disciplined over their refusal to carry out missions in what they considered improperly armored vehicles.
Hungarian troops were said to be covering their non-armored Mercedes-Benz G-Class vehicles with ballistic vests on the outside.
Military-supplied "up-armour"
The US Army began deploying 'up-armour' kits to better protect military vehicles in August 2003, two years before the Marine Corps would. Three levels of 'up-armour' were implemented:
- Level I: fully integrated armour installed during vehicle production or retrofit (including ballistic windows)
- Level II: add-on armour (including ballistic windows)
- Level III: locally fabricated armour (interim solution, lacking ballistic windows)
The process of up-armouring all vehicles was to be complete by mid-2005.
As recently as February 2006, the Army was welding additional armour onto the armoured Humvee variant M1114 and 5-ton MTV in Iraq.
The United States Marines developed their own Marine Armour Kit (MAK), consisting of bolt-on armour for the crew compartment, ballistic glass, suspension upgrades, and air conditioning. However, the kit was not fielded until early 2005, and even then only to certain specified units. The armour was made available for MTVRs, LVSs and HMMWVs. Level I armour kits are now phasing out MAKs for MTVRs and M1114 HMMWVs.
Rumsfeld questioning incident
The practice of U.S. troops reinforcing their vehicles with improvised armour became well known after a U.S. soldier questioned U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld about the need to salvage armour from scrap materials on December 8, 2004 at Camp Buehring, Kuwait. The question was met with cheers from fellow troops.
Wilson: "Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles? And why don't we have those resources readily available to us?"
Rumsfeld: "It isn't a matter of money. It isn't a matter on the part of the Army of desire. It's a matter of production and capability of doing it. As you know, ah, you go to war with the army you have -- not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time. You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and (still) be blown up..."
Rumsfeld was paying a visit to approximately 2,300 troops on the eve of their deployment across the border to Iraq. Specialist Thomas Wilson of the 278th Regimental Combat Team (Tennessee Army National Guard) asked the question, but it was later revealed that Lee Pitts, an embedded reporter for the Chattanooga Times Free Press, had asked Wilson to make the inquiry.
Several related questions were asked of Rumsfeld by other troops. Some of Wilson's fellow soldiers and commanders supported his inquiry in later interviews. Col. John Zimmermann, Staff Judge Advocate of Wilson's unit said that 95 percent of the unit's 300 vehicles lacked appropriate armour, and suggested that it was the result of a double standard used to equip the National Guard as compared with active-duty forces.
On December 9, 2004, President George W. Bush responded to the incident, saying that the expressed concerns were being addressed.
On December 10, 2004, it was reported that following the incident, Armor Holdings, Inc., the company producing armoured Humvees for the Army, was asked to increase production from 450 to 550 per month--its maximum capacity. Also on December 10, Congressman Marty Meehan (D-MA, House Armed Services Committee) issued a news release harshly critical of the Bush administration and The Pentagon: Meehan described the shortage of armoured vehicles as "a dangerously exposed center of gravity" of America's military presence in Iraq, and the lack of preparedness for insurgent tactics such as deploying improvised explosive devices (IEDs) as "symptomatic of a headlong rush to war."
On December 15, 2004, the Department of Defense held a special briefing on the issue of up-armouring. Officials stated that the process of up-armouring SPC Wilson's unit was nearly complete on December 8, and was completed within 24 hours of the incident. Brig. Gen. Jeff Sorenson, Deputy for Acquisition Systems Management, stated during the briefing that fully armoured vehicles had been isolated and destroyed in the former Soviet Union's campaigns in Afghanistan and Chechnya, and that the hearts and minds aspect of the Army's counterinsurgency efforts would be negatively impacted were soldiers to remain isolated from the populace in fully armoured vehicles.
Aftermath
The incident sparked criticism of Rumsfeld, and led some to question the nation's commitment to its troops.
Libyan civil war
During the 2011 Libyan civil war, anti-Gaddafi forces were seen operating T-55 tanks and technicals with improvised armour mounted on them, likely in an attempt to improve survivability against superior Libyan Army hardware such as T-72 tanks.
War in Donbass
During the War in Donbass, units on both sides of the conflict have improvised armour added to vehicles like the BTR-80. The Azov Battalion has developed their own vehicle, the Azovets, similar to the Russian BMPT Terminator.
Syrian Civil War and War against the Islamic State
In their role in the ongoing Syrian Kurdish-Islamist conflict and Syrian Civil War and finding themselves lacking in the amount of modern armor, members of the Kurdistan peshmerga and People's Protection Units (YPG) were reported to have fabricated homemade armored fighting vehicles of widely varying designs to fight ISIS militants, who are armed with captured modern armor. Many of the improvised vehicles were converted tractors and farm equipment fitted with Soviet-era guns, some with elaborate paint schemes and designs. Western commentators and reporters have likened the appearance of some of these vehicles as like the makeshift vehicles featured in the Mad Max post-apocalyptic action multi-media franchise. The allied Free Syrian Army rebels have also been reported to have fashioned similar makeshift armored fighting vehicles.
Battle of Marawi
Also in the Battle of Marawi, the Ground forces of the Philippines' Army and Marine Corps are using wooden clad armor on their Armored Personnel carriers such as the GKN Simba, V-150, M113A2 and Marine LAV-300 FSV/APC to prevent the enemy RPG fires from the Maute and Abu Sayyaf terrorists on the city.
Non-military use
During the 1984 UK miners' strike, buses used for transporting strikebreakers to work were armoured against attacks by strikers by fitting metal bars to their windows. These improvised armoured buses were nicknamed "battle buses".
In recent years, some storm chasers in the United States have developed purpose-made Tornado Intercept Vehicles designed to survive the hostile environment inside a tornado. These vehicles are built on truck and SUV chassis with heavy armour shells built onto them consisting of steel, kevlar, polycarbonate, and Rhino Linings to protect against airborne debris.
Drug gangs involved in the Mexican Drug War have in a number of cases fitted improvised armour to heavy trucks.
The machine used in the Marvin Heemeyer incident was a modified Komatsu D355A bulldozer, fitted with makeshift armor plating covering the cabin, engine, and parts of the tracks. In places, this armor was over 1 foot (30 cm) thick, consisting of 5000-PSI Quikrete concrete mix fitted between sheets of tool steel (acquired from an automotive dealer in Denver), to make ad-hoc composite armor. This made the machine impervious to small arms fire and resistant to explosives: three external explosions and more than 200 rounds of ammunition were fired at the bulldozer and had no effect on it.
See also
References
External links
- US Soldiers show off Hillbilly Armor - Video clip from the film Gunner Palace (2005)
- Hillbilly Armor - Discussion thread at Glock Talk Forums
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments